In this new video, Bob talks about how the idea for the book came about. He’s been working to engage Harvard on the issues of responsible ownership for over thirty years but the current student divest movement spurred him to think about what action by Harvard could look like. Two things — an investment policy, and a “facility” (not in the buildings-and-grounds sense, but in the “quality practice” sense) for cultivating stewardship sensibilities — form the basis of Trusting Harvard.
Marcy has a post on CSRwire called, “The University as Fiduciary.” Explaining the concept behind Trusting Harvard she writes, “it’s time to apply the civic moral principles that lie at the heart of its academic mission to the manner in which the endowment is managed. It’s time to address the “house divided” problem, and restore ethical integrity to the whole institution.” Read the story…
For decades, Bob Monks has promoted a simple idea: that property owners—even if the property is a share of corporate equity, or pile of funds to invest—have a civic moral responsibility for their holdings. At minimum, their obligation is to assure that no laws have been broken, no damage to others inflicted. More broadly, property owners have an obligation for active engagement, to assure positive performance and ethical integrity. That’s a form of citizenship that’s good for democracy, as well as capital markets. And it views “capital” holistically, connecting the stock and flow of financial, environmental, social, human, and other forms of capital because that’s how the real economy works.
These concepts of “stewardship”, “ethics”, “capital”, and “citizenship” are the pillars undergirding Trusting Harvard. In it, Monks once again makes his argument to a Harvard President, this time on the occasion of his 80th birthday and months before his 60th Harvard reunion. Along with co-author Marcy Murninghan, he provides a framework for answering two questions:
- How can Harvard fulfill its fiduciary obligation as an investor in ways that advance its beliefs, values and commitments?
- How can Harvard take the lead in creating a curriculum for students, professionals, and the general public about the civic moral obligations of wealth?
While aimed at Harvard, the issues covered are relevant to other universities and tax-exempt institutional investors, because they have a special duty to advance the public interest. In addition to fiduciary and curricular frameworks—the “myopic”, “ethical”, and “integrated” fiduciary; a tiered approach to gaining fiduciary knowledge and competence—a series of questions for trustees to ask are included. The result is a call to action to restore the social compact affecting universities and other public fiduciaries. That means moving away from a “house divided”, wherein fiduciary and program responsibilities reside in separate wings, to one wherein they are inextricably linked. And that’s good for everybody.